Dr Federico Ortino is Reader in International Economic Law at King’s College London. I will focus my (two) brief remarks on Part II of Martins Paparinskis’ excellent monograph. First, the main argument in Part II (and one of the central themes of the entire work) is that “treaty rules on fair and equitable treatment refer to the customary minimum standard” (p 159) as a matter of Art 31(1) of the VCLT. Interestingly, before explaining the claim in positive terms (pp 160-166), Chapter 5 elaborates at length the claim in negative terms (pp 111-153): “no argument limited to treaty law can explain the existing and accepted practice [of elaborating the concept of fair and equitable treatment on a case-by-case basis]” (p 153). In short, investment tribunals’ reliance on previous investment tribunal decisions for purposes of interpreting pari materia treaty rules (like fair and equitable treatment clauses) cannot be justified within the boundaries of the customary rules of treaty interpretation (Art 31-32 VCLT), unless through the reference to customary…
Investor-State Arbitration Tribunals
Page 23 of 23
The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment
Martins Paparinskis is a Junior Research Fellow at Merton College, Oxford. I am grateful to EJIL:Talk! for hosting the discussion of my book, The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment. I am privileged to have Sir Frank Berman, Federico Ortino, and Anthea Roberts as discussants of…
Discussion of Martins Paparinskis’s International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment
This week we will be hosting a discussion of Martins Paparinskis’ book The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment, recently published by Oxford University Press. Martins is currently a Junior Research Fellow at Merton College, Oxford. Prior to this he was a Hauser Research Scholar at NYU Law School and completed his MJur and…
- First
- Page 23 of 23