Introduction This post addresses issues being considered in the UNCITRAL Working Group III process in relation to the design of a multilateral instrument on investor–State dispute settlement (ISDS) reform (hereinafter an ‘MIIR’). An MIIR is envisioned as the legal mechanism for applying the various reform options being developed by UNCITRAL Working Group III to the extensive network of existing investment treaties. A first draft of an MIIR was published by the UNCITRAL secretariat in July 2024 (A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.246) and this was discussed by Working Group III in the first part of its Fifty-First session in February 2025 (A/CN.9/1196 paras 31–94) and in its Forty-Ninth session in September 2024 (A/CN.9/1194 paras 105–121). Ahead of the Working Group’s February 2025 session, some participants also made written submissions on the topic of an MIIR, including the European Union (EU) and the United States.
International Economic Law
Page 1 of 51
What President Trump’s “Reciprocal” Tariffs Mean for International (Trade) Law
When US President Donald Trump announced the imposition of “reciprocal” tariffs on virtually the entire globe on April 2nd, many observers felt that they were witnessing a historic event—the “end of globalization as we know it”, the starting shot to an economic calamity on the scale of the Covid-19 pandemic or, as the prime minister of…
Clocked Out: How the Armenian Civil Code Sank a $331 Million Claim
Can a three-year deadline in Armenia’s Civil Code derail a $331 million investment arbitration? The recent ICSID award in Rasia FZE and Joseph K. Borkowski v. Republic of Armenia says yes, exposing a critical spot in investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS): the quiet power of domestic law to strangle investment claims. The dispute stemmed from a…
Compliance through Enforcement in ISDS: What can UNCITRAL Working Group III learn from the ECtHR?
The ISDS reform process at UNCITRAL Working Group III provides a unique opportunity to consider new institutional dispute settlement designs. As EJIL:Talk! Readers will know from earlier blogs on this reform process, a standing mechanism to resolve investment disputes is one of the key proposals in the strengthening of the institutional design, with a Draft Statute…
Undoing the Grand Bargain? Pax Americana and the United Nations
Since its 3 February 2025 Executive Order, the United States has engaged in a series of decisions to either pause or entirely remove funding for various international organizations and agencies within the United Nations system, including withdrawing from the World Health Organization, withdrawing from the United Nations Human Rights Council, the 90-day pause in…
- Page 1 of 51
- Last